Fatigue & Failure

Fatigue criteria, stress concentration and failure theories.

MODULE OVERVIEW

Fatigue & Failure in practical engineering work.

Fatigue is damage caused by repeated stress, often at levels below static yield. Mean stress, alternating stress, surface condition, size, notches and environment must be established before using a fatigue criterion.

CORE PRINCIPLES

What to establish first

  • Stress range and mean stress both influence fatigue risk.
  • Notches and surface condition can reduce endurance strength.
  • A safety factor should use a material condition and duty cycle that are documented.

DESIGN CONCEPTS

Terms worth checking

  • S–N data
  • Mean-stress correction
  • Stress concentration

Common applications: Rotating shafts · Welded structures · Springs and cyclic fixtures

KEY RELATIONSHIP

Modified Goodman relation

1/n = σa/Se + σm/Sut

  • σa — alternating stress
  • σm — mean stress
  • Se — corrected endurance limit
  • Sut — ultimate strength

It is a linear screening criterion; actual endurance data and modification factors are required for design.

Fatigue & Failure relationship diagramKnown input variables flow through the named engineering relationship to a result that needs design review.KNOWN INPUTSσa — alternating stressσm — mean stressSe — corrected endurance limitMODEL1/n = σa/Se + σm/SutRESULT→
Use the relationship with compatible units, then review the result against the stated design conditions.

WORKED EXAMPLE

Known values → substitution → interpretation

Known values
Sut = 550 MPa; assumed Se = 275 MPa; σa = 100 MPa; σm = 80 MPa
Method
Substitute in the Goodman relation
Interpretation
The preliminary safety factor is about 2.02 before surface, notch and reliability corrections.

KEY DESIGN CHECKS

Confirm the conditions behind the number

  • Define the governing load case, duty cycle and required design life before using a simplified relation.
  • Use compatible units and material data for the actual condition, temperature and manufacturing state.
  • Compare the result with strength, stiffness, fatigue, safety, serviceability and applicable-code requirements.

COMMON ENGINEERING MISTAKES

Keep the model within its scope

  • Applying modified goodman relation outside the assumptions shown on this page.
  • Using a nominal condition while a peak, alternating, transient or environmental case governs the design.
  • Treating a calculated value as a final component selection without checking interfaces, tolerances and the current governing standard.

AVAILABLE CALCULATORS

Select a calculator

RELATED RESOURCE

Open Fatigue Safety Factor Calculator

Visualize mean and alternating stress in a preliminary Goodman check.

Open related resource →

REFERENCES & LIMITATIONS

Use this content as a transparent starting point

ReferenceJ. E. Shigley et al., Mechanical Engineering Design, fatigue chapters; use test data and governing codes for critical equipment.ScopeRelationships are presented for the assumptions stated on this page and linked tool.Design reviewCheck material condition, loads, environment and the applicable current code.SafetyResults are educational/preliminary and do not certify safety or compliance.

RELATED ENGINEERING

Continue the workflow