Fatigue criteria, stress concentration and failure theories.
MODULE OVERVIEW
Fatigue & Failure in practical engineering work.
Fatigue is damage caused by repeated stress, often at levels below static yield. Mean stress, alternating stress, surface condition, size, notches and environment must be established before using a fatigue criterion.
CORE PRINCIPLES
What to establish first
Stress range and mean stress both influence fatigue risk.
Notches and surface condition can reduce endurance strength.
A safety factor should use a material condition and duty cycle that are documented.
DESIGN CONCEPTS
Terms worth checking
S–N data
Mean-stress correction
Stress concentration
Common applications: Rotating shafts · Welded structures · Springs and cyclic fixtures
KEY RELATIONSHIP
Modified Goodman relation
1/n = σa/Se + σm/Sut
σa — alternating stress
σm — mean stress
Se — corrected endurance limit
Sut — ultimate strength
It is a linear screening criterion; actual endurance data and modification factors are required for design.
Use the relationship with compatible units, then review the result against the stated design conditions.
WORKED EXAMPLE
Known values → substitution → interpretation
Known values
Sut = 550 MPa; assumed Se = 275 MPa; σa = 100 MPa; σm = 80 MPa
Method
Substitute in the Goodman relation
Interpretation
The preliminary safety factor is about 2.02 before surface, notch and reliability corrections.
KEY DESIGN CHECKS
Confirm the conditions behind the number
Define the governing load case, duty cycle and required design life before using a simplified relation.
Use compatible units and material data for the actual condition, temperature and manufacturing state.
Compare the result with strength, stiffness, fatigue, safety, serviceability and applicable-code requirements.
COMMON ENGINEERING MISTAKES
Keep the model within its scope
Applying modified goodman relation outside the assumptions shown on this page.
Using a nominal condition while a peak, alternating, transient or environmental case governs the design.
Treating a calculated value as a final component selection without checking interfaces, tolerances and the current governing standard.
ReferenceJ. E. Shigley et al., Mechanical Engineering Design, fatigue chapters; use test data and governing codes for critical equipment.ScopeRelationships are presented for the assumptions stated on this page and linked tool.Design reviewCheck material condition, loads, environment and the applicable current code.SafetyResults are educational/preliminary and do not certify safety or compliance.